CEBS Why is XBRL recommended to be used?

From XBRLWiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 17:11, 14 April 2010 (edit)
Katrin (Talk | contribs)
(Introduction)
← Previous diff
Revision as of 17:12, 14 April 2010 (edit)
Katrin (Talk | contribs)
(efficiency)
Next diff →
Line 39: Line 39:
<ul> <ul>
<li>Eases the possibility of automation by supporting</li> <li>Eases the possibility of automation by supporting</li>
 +<ul>
<li>automated error detection</li> <li>automated error detection</li>
<li>versioning</li> <li>versioning</li>
Line 44: Line 45:
<li>Time and cost saving for the reporting entity because of early responses</li> <li>Time and cost saving for the reporting entity because of early responses</li>
<li>One common format is more cost-effective than a numerous number of different proprietary formats</li> <li>One common format is more cost-effective than a numerous number of different proprietary formats</li>
 +</ul>
</ul> </ul>

Revision as of 17:12, 14 April 2010

Image:Corep_finrep_logo.gif

Contribution dated 2009-12-23

ALL TOPICS ARE STILL ON DISCUSSION!

Contents

Introduction

(To be completed)

Image:Benefits.gif

communication

  • Single, XML-derived reporting standard
  • Detailed understanding of data model
  • Interoperability with existing XML schemas
  • Several languages can be incorporated<

transparency

  • Comparability of data across Europe
  • Possibility of a faster exchange of information with regard to the financial crisis
  • Versioning will be supported
  • Open source

flexibility

  • XBRL is extensible --> adaptation to national discretions
  • Modularised architecture of XBRL
  • Structural changes in the data are not reflected in the instance

efficiency

  • Reduction of cost and time along the supply chain for financial information
    • Eases the possibility of automation by supporting
      • automated error detection
      • versioning
    • Time and cost saving for the reporting entity because of early responses
    • One common format is more cost-effective than a numerous number of different proprietary formats

flexibility

  • XBRL is extensible --> adaptation to national discretions
  • Possibility of a faster exchange of information with regard to the financial crisis
  • Versioning will be supported
  • Open source

Image:WhyXBRL.gif

Personal tools