Talk:European Data Point Methodology
From XBRLWiki
(Difference between revisions)
| Revision as of 20:32, 21 February 2013 (edit) Thierry.Declerck (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 20:48, 21 February 2013 (edit) Thierry.Declerck (Talk | contribs) (→Comments) Next diff → |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| === Comment-03 === | === Comment-03 === | ||
| TD: Editorial Comment: I would write : "data structures *that can be* represented in supervisory tables" //// (similar to the following clause) | TD: Editorial Comment: I would write : "data structures *that can be* represented in supervisory tables" //// (similar to the following clause) | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Comment-04 === | ||
| + | TD: Editorial Comment: I think we should include in this section later all the terms and definitions the document is making use of , even if the terms and definitions are not inported from other documents. | ||
Revision as of 20:48, 21 February 2013
Contents |
Comments
Comment-01
RH: this does not take anything away for authors not providing a clear definition of each of the aspects that forms a single data point (or cell in a table).
Comment-02
RH: The explanation is mixing elements with members. For DPM member hierarchies have more meaning than 'normal' element hierarchies may have. KH: The name elements has been replaced by members.
Comment-03
TD: Editorial Comment: I would write : "data structures *that can be* represented in supervisory tables" //// (similar to the following clause)
Comment-04
TD: Editorial Comment: I think we should include in this section later all the terms and definitions the document is making use of , even if the terms and definitions are not inported from other documents.
